Archive for category Paranormal

Signs (2002)

SignsAfter The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable, M. Night Shyamalan brought us Signs, starring Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix. Finally diving into the extra-terrestrial, Shyamalan’s technique of story telling has once again delivered the goods with a suspenseful plot. In a world where movies tend to show everything graphically it’s refreshing to see something not being shown – building the tension until the climax arrives. And apart from that Shyamalan tells an intriguing story of lost and found faith, coupled with a sense of purpose in the grander scheme of things.

I’ve heard some people complain about the fact that the aliens were eventually shown in the movie, and that this ruined it. To me this wasn’t so much of a problem. While most of the movie gained in tension by not showing them, the final parts served to portray the shock that people experience when faced with something never seen before. This gives it a purpose. Some people may still not like it, but that’s their right.

In my opinion Shyamalan hasn’t topped The Sixth Sense with any of his subsequent movies, although they were each quite intriguing in their own way – with the exception of one: The Happening. The movie had good tension initially, but it just didn’t go anywhere. Additionally, I was expecting one of his trademark twists at the end, but it turned out quite ordinary. Maybe Shyamalan was trying to bring across a different message with this film, but for me it didn’t fit into his style.

Anyway, if you are interested in the paranormal and a good suspense drama, give Signs (buy at Amazon) a try.

More M. Night Shyamalan movies:

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Tags: , , ,

Knowing (2009): What was the point?

Knowing

Knowing

Earlier this year saw the release of Knowing, starring Nicholas Cage and Rose Byrne. The trailer made it look promising, and the first two thirds of the movie were not too bad, but then the story took a turn for the worse. And the ending just put the last nail in the coffin.

The premise was a good idea: people being able to predict when and where disasters happen in the future. There’s a lot you can do with this. So what did the film makers do with it? Here’s a (slightly tongue-in-cheek) plot outline (Warning – SPOILERS ahead):

  1. John Koestler discovers “the code”.
  2. John discovers what the code means and witnesses disasters as they happen.
  3. Along with Diane and the children, he investigates the “final” event of the code.
  4. They discover that the end of the world is imminent and everyone will die. (not too bad up until this point)
  5. Diane dies and aliens (in a pixelated spaceship) come to fetch Diane’s and John’s children (who are remarkably unaffected by all this).
  6. The alien’s leave in a pixelated display of CGI to start a new Earth, since this Earth has gone awry.
  7. The audience gasps at how badly the sequence has been rendered (graphically).
  8. As Earth is consumed by huge waves of fire, John dies with his family.
  9. The audience wonders what the point was.

In many ways it made for a very flat story, once you’ve seen the ending. There’s really no purpose in everything that happens, which is disappointing.

What did you think of this movie? Did you enjoy it, or did you have similar thoughts to mine? Let me know by leaving a comment below.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Tags: , , ,